24-10-2018, 08:10 | #1 |
Leading Aircraftsman
Регистрация: Jan 2017
Сообщений: 19
|
Udaloi in 1.46
In multiplayer, the Udaloi earned the status of a ship with a strong air defense.
But we are playing a simulator, so it was thought to nerf its anti-aircraft missiles to real 8 miles. I talked with Pepe about it, he completely agrees, but tests are needed to prevent the ship from becoming useless. В мультиплеере удалой заслужил статус корабля с сильным ПВО. Но мы играем в симулятор, поэтому появилась мысль урезания его зенитных ракет до реальных 8 миль. Я поговорил с Пепе про это, он полностью согласен, но нужны тесты, чтобы корабль не стал бесполезным. |
24-10-2018, 11:08 | #2 |
Sergeant
Регистрация: Jul 2016
Сообщений: 235
|
For me 12 Nm is good for better game purposes even when real SA-N-9 range is shorter. (it helps to keep enemy helo/MPA away from Udaloy)
If you want to decrease range to 8 Nm it will be also ok. I agree for that, even if Udaloy is ship that I play the most Udaloy CIWS still is much better than Perry's in RA 1.46 In my opinion CIWS should be "last hope" of defence - with small effectivenes (compare to current RA 1.45) not only on Udaloy but all playable surfs. Im no military expert but i think real effectivnes is no higher than 30-40% (probably only 15% 25% ) In RA it's around 95% against subsonic. RA 1.46 will make this aspect of defence more realistic for every playable and AI surfs Don't panic mate |
25-10-2018, 23:42 | #3 |
Aircraftsman
Регистрация: Oct 2018
Сообщений: 8
|
ДАЁШЬ РЕАЛИЗМ
Я за реализм. Это симулятор прежде всего, а потом уже игра. Баланс в миссиях нужно находить иными способами, нежели равнение платформ под одну гребенку. И ежели приходится выбирать между и так коротким ПВО у Удалого и эффективностью 30 мм пушки, я выбираю меньшее из двух зол склоняясь к реализму. Вердикт - Урезаем ПВО!
|
28-10-2018, 00:53 | #4 |
Bugcatcher
Регистрация: Nov 2008
Адрес: Russia Kursk City
Сообщений: 1,019
|
And missiles and CIWS - it's all air defense (PVO).
What did you mean? PS: From the gaming point of view, launch the Gauntlet can not run in 3-5 seconds increments (in fact, the launch tube still is all ONE - like in Perry). More preferable - CIWS station. Udaloy have 4 stations AK-630, instead of 1 Phlanks on Perry. Of course - for the Udaloy, in addition, a stronger defense is the CIWS rather than the Gauntlet.
__________________
Only the dead have seen the end of the war. |
28-10-2018, 19:16 | #5 |
Sergeant
Регистрация: Jul 2016
Сообщений: 235
|
|
02-11-2018, 18:12 | #6 |
Sergeant
Регистрация: Jul 2016
Сообщений: 235
|
Test video from released 1.46
https://youtu.be/H3-MfFFD5us Replay since 14:48 Link to scenario: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yE_...tFCSV0mC8/view COMMENT: Udaloy is still very good playable ship for missile defence. In this test scenario were launched 20-22 missiles from AI Los Angeles Flt III First wave defended only with CIWS and Chaffs (in EMCON) Next waves of missiles with both radars ON ------------------------------------------------ The same test for Bergamini: https://youtu.be/44172mbuBWY Radars all the time are ON ------------------------------------------------ Last test for Perry: https://youtu.be/oZTLoJQw-5U All ships have chances for simultanous missile defence. Each ship do this in little different way. Последний раз редактировалось pepe; 02-11-2018 в 19:07. |
Здесь присутствуют: 1 (пользователей: 0 , гостей: 1) | |
|
|